Enforcement of Awards

Caseload and enforcement statistics for Hong Kong and HKIAC

HomeAt A GlanceStatisticsEnforcement of Awards

Enforcement of Awards in Hong Kong: 2016

 

 

 

No of applications to enforce arbitral awards

No of applications to set aside order granting leave

No of orders set aside

Name of Appointing Authority

No of applications granted

1
Beijing Arbitration Commission
1
0
0
2
CIETAC (Beijing) 1
4
1
0
3CIETAC (Shanghai) 2100
4

Guangzhou Arbitration Commission

1
0
0
5Guangzhou Arbitration Commission Dongguan Branch100
6
Hong Kong 3
7
1
0
7
Hong Kong (HKIAC) 4
0
1
0
8
Israel 5
1
0
0
9
Jinan Arbitration Commission
1
0
0
10
London6
3
0
1
11
London (GAFTA)7
1
0
0
12
London (ICC)8
110
13
London (LCIA)9
200
14New York (ICC)10110
15Quanzhou Arbitration Commission100
16Shenzhen Arbitration Commission100
17Singapore11100
18Singapore International Arbitration Centre100
19Sydney 12100
20Vancouver13100
21Xian Arbitration Commission100
 
Total:
32
51
Note: Information provided by the Hong Kong Judiciary.
  1. China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (Beijing)
  2. China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (Shanghai)
  3. Sole Arbitrator/Arbitrators, Hong Kong
  4. Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC)
  5. Sole Arbitrator, Israel
  6. Sole Arbitrator/Arbitrators, London
  7. The Grain and Feed Trade Association, London
  8. International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce, London
  9. London Court of International Arbitration
  10. International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce, New York
  11. Sole Arbitrator, Singapore
  12. Arbitrators, Sydney, Australia
  13. British Columbia International Commercial Arbitration Center, Vancouver

Share this