Enforcement of Awards in Hong Kong (2014)

Caseload and enforcement statistics for Hong Kong and HKIAC

HomeAt A GlanceStatisticsEnforcement of AwardsEnforcement of Awards in Hong Kong (2014)

Enforcement of Awards in Hong Kong: 2014

 

 

No of applications to enforce arbitral awards

No of applications to set aside order granting leave

No of orders set aside

Name of Appointing Authority

No of applications granted

1
CIETAC 1 (Beijing)
3
0
0
2
CIETAC (Shanghai)
2
0
0
3
France (ICC) 3
1
0
0
4
Guangzhou Arbitration Commission
2
0
0
5

Hong Kong 4

3
0
0
6
Hong Kong (HKIAC) 5
8
0
0
7
London 6
3
0
0
8
London (LMAA) 7
1
1 8
0
9
New York 9
1
0
0
10
SCIA 10
5
2 11
0
11
Shanghai Arbitration Commission
1
0
0
12
Singapore (SIAC) 12
200
13
Switzerland 13
100
14
Switzerland (SCA) 14
100
 
Total:
34
3
0
 
Note: Information provided by the Hong Kong Judiciary.
1 China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission 中國國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會or CIETAC (Beijing)
2 China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Shanghai Sub-Commission 中國國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會上海分會
3 International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), International Court of Arbitration
4 Sole Arbitrator, Hong Kong
5 Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC)
6 Sole Arbitrator/Arbitrators, London
7 London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA)
8 HCCT 20/2013 (Hon Mimmie Chan J)
9 International Centre for Dispute Resolution, International Arbitration Tribunal
10 South China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission, Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration 華南國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會深圳國際仲裁院 or CIETAC (Shenzhen)
11 HCCT 43/2013 (Hon Mimmie Chan J), HCCT 14/2014 (Hon Chow J)
12 Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
13 Arbitrators, Switzerland
14 Swiss Chambers’ Arbitration (SCA)

Share this